MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416707235 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3637674

Closed Form Continuous Time Neural Networks for Audio Packet Loss Concealment

2025· article· W4416707235 on OpenAlexafffund
Yashvardhan Joshi, Miles Thorogood

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General Hospital
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial neural networkNetwork packetPacket lossTime delay neural networkRecurrent neural networkDimension (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Packet Loss Concealment (PLC) for Network Music Performance (NMP) has facilitated musical interaction by taking advantage of data streaming through time-sensitive network communication. The ambiguous and dynamic audio signals in contemporary NMP music present challenges for PLC technology. To address the issue, this paper investigates using Closed-form Continuous Time Neural Networks (CfC), which transforms static neural network model and the time dimension of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) into a continuous vector field, thus enabling the model to have dynamic and adaptive learning for nonuniformly sampled data for audio packet loss concealment in a simulated packet loss environment. To provide a comprehensive comparison, this paper presents the results of the CfC time neural network with an Auto-Regressive model and ground truth analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207