MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416707545 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3637515

AMADRL: Privacy-Aware Attention-Based Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Spectral Allocation in 6G Vehicular Networks

2025· article· W4416707545 on OpenAlexafffund
Iqra Batool, Mostafa M. Fouda, Muhammad Ismail, Shikhar Verma, Zubair Md. Fadlullah

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsReinforcement learningScalabilityQuality of serviceSpectral efficiencyVehicular ad hoc networkLatency (audio)Optimization problemDual (grammatical number)Frequency allocation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of 6G-enabled Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) networks has created unprecedented demand for ultra-reliable, low-latency spectrum allocation across heterogeneous entities including vehicles, IoT devices, and industrial systems. Current spectrum allocation methods suffer from exponential computational complexity, extensive information sharing requirements, and poor scalability in dense networks. This paper proposes AMADRL (Attention-based Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning), a novel framework employing dual critic networks with multi-head self-attention mechanisms for intelligent spectrum allocation. The dual critic architecture resolves individual-collective optimization conflicts through local critics for independent entity optimization and a global critic with attention-based coordination. Our approach significantly reduces information sharing requirements while handling heterogeneous QoS demands across diverse entity types. Comprehensive experimental evaluation comparing AMADRL against state-of-the-art baselines including MADDPG, MAAC, QMIX, attention-based methods (A-DDPG, MHA-DQN), and game-theoretic approaches reveals that AMADRL achieves superior performance across multiple metrics including spectrum utilization efficiency, interference mitigation, and network scalability, while preserving user privacy and satisfying strict latency constraints required by safety-critical and industrial use cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207