Bibliographic record
Abstract
ÍNDICE 1. Tema de investigación 2. Planteamiento del problema 3. Objetivos 4. Preguntas de investigación 5. Justificación del estudio 6. Marco teórico 7. Hipótesis 8. Recolección de datos e información 9. Problemas de la investigación 10.Bibliografía de HEC para realizar la tesis doctoral sobre el CdS.Evidentemente esta es una oportunidad única para profundizar en el tema en una de las organizaciones más creativas del mundo, una organización que nació a iniciativa de artistas callejeros, personas en gran medida excluidas del medio social, y que al cabo de los años han logrado crear una de las organizaciones más originales del mundo.El CdS es mundialmente conocido y mucho se ha escrito sobre él, si bien abundan los artículos periodísticos, que no los análisis académicos.Por lo mismo, considero que aún hay historias que contar, en particular, re-construir la 'arqueología organizacional' de algunos actores que participan en ese proyecto de magia, teatro, circo, multimedia, humor y tecnología.En sus propias palabras, el Cirque du Soleil se define así: Backgroud: Founded in Quebec in 1984, Cirque du Soleil™ is a worldwide organization headquartered in Montreal with international operations in the fields of artistic creation, production, performance, merchandising and multimedia.Mission: Invoke, provoke and evoke the imagination, the senses and the emotions of people around the world.Headquarters and Offices: Headquartered in Montreal (North American Tour and Orlando Operations), Cirque du Soleil™ has five offices around the world.In addition to its head office in Montreal, there is a second in Amsterdam that oversees Cirque's European operations; a third in Las Vegas, which oversees hotel/casino operations; and a fourth one in Singapore which oversees the Asia-Pacific Tour. 1 Así, esta investigación se abocará a re-construir la historia personal de algunos actores del CdS en busca de elucidar sus capacidades y posibilidades para 'vivir creativamente' en una organización signada, justamente, por la creatividad.Es necesario mencionar que la investigación del CdS está supeditada a la obtención de apoyos económicos (becas) para poder realizar una estancia de 1 Home Page del Cirque du Soleil: http://www.cirquedusoleil.com
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".