MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

St. Lawrence Seaway: Canada and United States Joint Lifeline

2025· book· W4416720405 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Resources and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershedEstuaryFlood mythStreamflowPopulationDrainage basinWater resourcesMain riverFloodplain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River and Estuary form the St. Lawrence Seaway. Navigation is now possible with the creation of locks and dams from Western Lake Superior to the Atlantic Ocean and beyond. The Great Lakes drain through the St. Lawrence River to the Saint Lawrence Estuary and the Atlantic Ocean. The water flow originating from the Lake Superior watershed flows through the Great Lakes watersheds and into the St. Lawrence River watershed before being discharged into the Atlantic Ocean. Changing climates and extreme weather events over the millennia have carved new channels through river bottomlands, leaving rock-exposed uplands and fertile valleys behind while altering the location of the St. Lawrence River. Since great rivers often become national or state boundaries, their historic realignment has added or subtracted land from the countries and states that border them. For much of their history, the lands adjacent to these rivers were low-lying bottomlands that flood with the seasons, unconstrained by human structures. However, in the last century, these rivers have become agricultural economic engines as humans reengineered the rivers and their bottomlands with extensive systems of levees, locks and dams, floodwalls, and reservoirs. Through a series of engaging case studies accompanied by illustrative maps and photographs, the author examines the complex and ever-changing St. Lawrence River landscapes and its systems; review historical impacts of climate, economic and population growth, and efforts to manage river landscapes with engineered structures; and make recommendations on future management to protect soil and water resources and facilitate social, economic, and ecosystem balance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2500.135

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Resources and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207