MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416721386 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03108-25

Predicting bacterial-mediated entomopathogenicity through comparative genomics and statistical modeling

2025· article· en· W4416721386 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniela Yanez-Ortuno, Melissa Y. Chen, K. McDonald, Allison Gacad, Juli Carrillo, Cara H. Haney

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsGenomeGeneComparative genomicsGenomicsVirulenceModel organismENCODEFunctional genomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Bacterial genomes encode vast functional diversity and have both beneficial and detrimental effects on insect hosts. While genotype-to-phenotype relationships are known for specific insecticidal genes on individual insect hosts, whether these mechanisms will be effective on a phylogenetically distinct insect host is not always known. To determine if known virulence genes are effective on a new host, we developed a method to merge existing mechanistic knowledge with in vivo tests on a small number of bacterial isolates to predict bacterial genes associated with entomopathogenesis. We used a model consisting of Drosophila melanogaster interactions with pathogenic and commensal genome-sequenced strains of Pseudomonas bacteria. We compiled a database of previously described insecticidal and biocontrol genes within the Pseudomonas genus and used comparative genomics to probe the distribution of these genes across Pseudomonas strains. We found natural variation in the presence of known insecticidal genes across the genus. We tested the insect-killing capacity of 13 Pseudomonas spp. strains against D. melanogaster and found natural variation in insecticidal activity. To identify bacterial genes associated with fly mortality, we employed two statistical models to correlate bacterial virulence with the presence of previously described insecticidal activity. To validate our predictions, we used a P. aeruginosa PAO1 transposon mutant library and identified eight operons that are necessary for killing D. melanogaster . We show that by combining existing literature with phenotyping a small number of strains, we identified both known and novel genes associated with insecticidal activity in D. melanogaster , using a rapid, scalable screening framework. More broadly, these findings illustrate a discovery pipeline for bacterial virulence mechanisms, accelerating the discovery of insect pest biocontrol mechanisms. IMPORTANCE Bacteria with insecticidal properties offer a promising alternative to chemical pesticides, but identifying effective strains and their underlying mechanisms remains a challenge. Here, we used Pseudomonas-D. melanogaster as a model to develop a predictive framework for determining which known bacterial genes with insecticidal activity are effective in a new host. By integrating comparative genomics, statistical modeling, and experimental validation, we identified insecticidal genes that are effective in D. melanogaster and highlighted new candidates for future study, demonstrating the utility of our integrative modeling approach. Our findings show that genetic predictors of virulence vary across Pseudomonas phylogenetic groups, highlighting the potential for targeted biocontrol strategies. We also demonstrate that disrupting specific pathways significantly reduces insecticidal activity, confirming their role in bacterial virulence. As Pseudomonas strains are found in diverse environments, this approach may be broadly applicable for predicting insecticidal efficacy in other bacterial genera. By improving our ability to identify and engineer microbial biocontrol agents, this work advances sustainable pest management strategies and provides new tools for reducing reliance on conventional pesticides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsFrench-language works237,207