Une économie informelle méta-institutionnalisée en Haïti ; Le cas du « Sistèm Pratik » et des Madan Sara
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude examine le « sistèm pratik » (SP), une méta-institution informelle développée par les Madan Sara (MS) en Haïti pour structurer l’économie informelle locale et transnationale. Fondée sur une enquête qualitative multisituée de 14 mois auprès de 28 participant·es, elle identifie quatre dimensions institutionnelles : financières (« sòl »), sécuritaires (gouvernance par les pair.es), judiciaires (tribunaux populaires) et commerciales (réseaux d’approvisionnement). L’approche néo-institutionnaliste révèle un système fondé sur la confiance, la solidarité et la réciprocité, opérant au-delà des frontières nationales, notamment dans les corridors Haïti–République dominicaine–Mexique. Le SP compense les déficits des institutions formelles et génère des dynamiques d’adaptation et d’innovation endogènes. Il constitue ainsi une forme de résistance institutionnelle, où les actrices de l’économie informelle transforment un espace marginalisé en levier de développement alternatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".