MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416721838 · doi:10.4000/157iv

Benevolence as a Determining Factor in the Social Regulation of Internal and External Stakeholders: The Case of an Organization Aiming to Include Immigrants

2025· article· fr· W4416721838 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nadia Lazzari-Dodeler, Marie-Noëlle Albert, Caroline Houle

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Organizational Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormativeValue (mathematics)ImmigrationInclusion (mineral)Grounded theoryProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we examine the regulation of internal and external stakeholders within an organization seeking to promote the inclusion of immigrants. The method employed is autopraxeography, an approach grounded in the experiences of the co-researchers, who are also the authors of this article. This case highlights benevolence as a value that spreads and guides the daily actions of internal and external stakeholders through internalized norms. The dissemination of ethical values requires both instrumental and normative forms of regulation, as well as managerial legitimacy, which constitutes one of the main contributions of this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicManagement and Organizational StudiesFrench-language works237,207