MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Navigating the Annotation Bottleneck: Active Learning for Scalable Maritime Data Analytics

2025· article· W4416726322 on OpenAlexaff
John M. Armitage, Phillip Curtis, Rami Abielmona, Emil M. Petriu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsLarus Technologies (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityBottleneckPipeline (software)Active learning (machine learning)AnnotationIdentification (biology)AnalyticsMobile deviceMacro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of maritime vessel trajectories is critical for enhancing safety, security, and operational efficiency in global shipping. However, large-scale manual annotation of Automatic Identification System (AIS) data remains a significant bottleneck due to its labour-intensive and costly nature. This paper introduces a novel Active Learning (AL) framework for trajectory classification, designed to minimize annotation effort while maintaining high model performance. The approach leverages time-series transformer embeddings to generate compact, temporally informed representations of vessel tracks, which are clustered to enable diversity-aware sampling. Four AL strategies - random, uncertainty-based, diversity-based, and a hybrid uncertainty-diversity approach - are evaluated within a scalable pipeline that integrates a vector database for efficient retrieval and a lightweight neural network for classification. Experiments on 5,000 vessel tracks demonstrate that the hybrid strategy achieves a Macro F1-score of 0.736 and Macro Precision of 0.784, while reducing labelling requirements by <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\sim 40 {\%}$</tex> compared to random sampling. Through 70 AL iterations, the hybrid sampling method balances exploration (diverse featurespace coverage) and exploitation (high-uncertainty sample selection), accelerating learning convergence. The framework's scalability is validated via integration with vector search infrastructure, enabling real-time deployment. Beyond maritime data analytics, this work generalizes to other time-series domains, such as air traffic management (ADS-B), IoT sensor streams, logistics, and Mobile Advertising Identification (MAID) data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207