MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MAKAN: Memristive Accelerated Kolmugruv-Arnold Networks

2025· article· W4416726779 on OpenAlexaff
Demeng Chen, Vince Tran, Roman Genov, Mostafa Rahimi Azghadi, Majid Ahmadi, Amirali Amirsoleimani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemristorScalabilityFlexibility (engineering)Artificial neural networkOverhead (engineering)Energy consumptionFunction (biology)Efficient energy use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional computing architectures struggle to keep up with modern neural networks due to energy consumption and processing speed limitations. To address these challenges, we propose MAKAN, a framework that integrates Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) with the BITLITE memristor-based computing platform. KANs, which use learnable activation functions on edges instead of fixed functions on nodes, offer superior flexibility and accuracy, but their reliance on spline-based functions limits scalability. MAKAN overcomes this by using hat functions for piecewise linear (PWL) function approximation, efficiently implemented on BITLITE's bit-wise memristor crossbars for matrix-vector multiplication (MVM). By employing machine learning to reconstruct KAN's spline functions with PWL on memristor circuits, MAKAN significantly reduces computational overhead while preserving accuracy and interpretability. This integration results in notable improvements in energy efficiency and processing speed, making advanced neural networks more scalable and practical for real-world applications, paving the way for future advancements in energy-efficient machine learning systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207