MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Joint Spatio-Temporal Correction for Both Turbulent and Stratified Tropospheric Delays in TS-InSAR

2025· article· W4416727691 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hongan Wu, Nan Liu, Yonghong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Yonghui Kang, Jujie Wei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsJoint (building)TroposphereFilter (signal processing)TurbulenceAtmospheric turbulenceRadarSpatial variabilityAtmospheric modelHumidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthetic aperture radar interferometry (InSAR) has been applied in ground deformation monitoring. However, the interferograms are susceptible to tropospheric delay artifacts, including both turbulent delays and stratified ones, especially in mountainous regions, due to temporal and spatial variation of temperature, humidity and pressure in the troposphere. Most atmospheric correction methods only address one of the delays and lack comprehensive consideration, thus it is hard to suppress the atmospheric artifacts completely. In this paper, we proposed a joint spatio-temporal correction (JSTC) method for both turbulent and stratified delays, which applies a dual-scale temporal low-pass filter to separate turbulent delays from other low-frequency components in temporal domain, then adopts the quadtree segmentation to correct stratified delays caused by spatial heterogeneity. The proposed method was first validated by simulated data, and then tested by real data in the mountainous region. The results demonstrated that our method can significantly reduce the impact of atmospheric artifacts on the interferograms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207