MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416730717 · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000003933

Recommendations for breastfeeding duration of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): Short- and long-term benefits

2025· article· en· W4416730717 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ye Feng, Juan Juan, Xu Wang, Fan Wang, Bingyi Wang, Huixia Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Medical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingGestational diabetesPrediabetesDiabetes mellitusOverweightPopulationPregnancyBreast feeding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Target population for the guidelines: Obstetric health care workers, midwives, and pregnant women. Clinical Question What are the short- and long-term health benefits of breastfeeding for both mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their offspring? Recommendations Table 1 - Recommendations for breastfeeding duration of mothers with GDM: Short- and Long-term benefits. Number Implementation period Risk factor mitigation GRADE† 1 Initiate BF(a) immediately postpartum, prioritize exclusive BF, and extend duration for optimal health outcomes Prediabetes and T2DM(b) in mothers* 2D 2 Exclusively BF ≥6 months Metabolic syndrome and NAFLD(c) in mothers* 2D 3 BF >18 months when feasible Cardiovascular disease in mothers* 2C 4 Early BF initiation T2DM in offspring* 2D 5 Exclusively BF for ≥1 month (ideally extending to 6 months when feasible) Overweight and obesity in offspring 2D *Longterm risk factor mitigation. †The GRADE approach classifies evidence quality into four levels: high (A), moderate (B), low (C), and very low (D). Recommendation strength (two levels): Strong recommendation (1), weak recommendation (2). BF: Breastfeeding; GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; NAFLD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recommendation Explanation Breastfeeding, the optimal nutritional source for infants, has multiple benefits. Breast milk delivers a balanced composition of essential nutrients for superior energy utilization and is enriched with bioactive substances, including immunoglobulins, antibodies, macrophages, and lymphocytes, which promote infant growth, development and long-term health. Reduction in maternal diabetes risk Breastfeeding decreases maternal diabetes risk, possibly by increasing prolactin levels, increasing insulin sensitivity, improving pancreatic β-cell function, and promoting lipid metabolism, thereby reducing blood glucose levels, visceral fat, and postpartum weight retention.[1–2] A 2020 systematic review (15 cohort studies, total participants with prior GDM = 4756) revealed that breastfeeding (typically assessed at 4–16 weeks postpartum) was associated with improved postpartum glucose regulation in mothers with gestational diabetes within 1 year postpartum, including significantly lower fasting plasma glucose levels (reductions of 3.7–7.4 mg/dL or 0.2–0.4 mmol/L in 75% of studies reporting mean values) and reduced rates of impaired glucose tolerance (in 60% of studies, with odds reductions up to 80% for high-intensity breastfeeding, e.g., adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04–0.80).[3] A 2021 systematic review of 29 cohort studies (17,970 participants with GDM) demonstrated that compared with formula consumption, breastfeeding reduced the long-term risk of prediabetes (relative risk [RR] = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.57–0.71) and T2DM (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66–0.86).[4] Subgroup analysis revealed that breastfeeding for <6 months and 6–12 months reduced the risk of prediabetes, whereas breastfeeding for <6 months and ≥12 months decreased the risk of T2DM. Exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months provided a stronger protective effect than mixed feeding did (RR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46–0.77). Reduction in maternal metabolic syndrome risk A 2023 cohort study (1176 postpartum women, 175 with GDM) revealed that each additional month of breastfeeding reduced maternal metabolic syndrome risk by 2% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99), with women with GDM showing greater benefits: a 9% reduction for exclusive breastfeeding (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85–0.97) and 3% for mixed breastfeeding (aHR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99) per month.[5] A 2024 cohort study (130 women with GDM) confirmed that exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months significantly reduced maternal metabolic syndrome risk compared with mixed feeding (aHR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.22–2.07).[6] Furthermore, another 2024 cohort study (130 women with GDM) revealed that breastfeeding >6 months and exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months significantly reduced the incidence of maternal non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14–0.95) compared with shorter durations or nonexclusive breastfeeding.[7] Reduction in maternal cardiovascular risk A 2024 study of 19,683 women (15,146 with T2DM and 4537 with GDM) during 100,218 person-years of follow-up revealed that 2.9% experienced cardiovascular disease (CVD) events.[8] Compared with never breastfeeding, breastfeeding >18 months reduced maternal CVD risk by 32% and coronary heart disease risk by 38%. Among women with GDM, breastfeeding for >18 months lowered CVD risk by 51%–62% (aHR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28–0.86), highlighting significant, multifaceted benefits for long-term metabolic and cardiovascular health. Reductions in the risks of T2DM, overweight, and obesity among offspring A 2016 Canadian cohort study (n = 334,553) revealed that early postpartum breastfeeding reduced the risk of T2DM among adolescent offspring by 17% (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69–0.99, P = 0.038).[9] A 2022 systematic review (13 cohorts, n = 12,657) revealed that breastfeeding significantly reduced the risk of overweight or obesity in offspring exposed to intrauterine hyperglycemia (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.53–0.84), with protection observed at 1–6 months (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37–0.75) and ≥6 months (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46–0.69), but it increased the risk at <1 month (OR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.41–3.27).[10] Both exclusive breastfeeding >1 month and mixed feeding were protective, with greater benefits observed in offspring aged 3–5 years and >5 years. This could potentially be attributed to the fact that breastfeeding increases the likelihood of offspring adopting healthy eating habits and lifestyles. Evidence Summary This rapid recommendation was developed in accordance with the standardized methodology framework outlined in the STAR Recommendations.[11] The detailed procedures are available in the Supplementary Materials, https://links.lww.com/CM9/C715. Funding This work was supported by grants from the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2024ZD0532100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82470863), and the Beijing Nova Program (No. 2024010). Conflicts of Interest None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Medical JournalSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207