MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416732025 · doi:10.47854/kt4nds85

Gouvernementalité et Gouvernance

2025· article· W4416732025 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Cynthia Kreichati

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropen · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower (physics)Michel foucaultContext (archaeology)Politics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si Michel Foucault a reconfiguré la notion de pouvoir en introduisant celle de gouvernementalité, les anthropologues ont montré combien ce concept permet de penser les formes contemporaines de régulation sociale au-delà de l’État. Émergente à partir du XVIIIe siècle, la gouvernementalité désigne une rationalité politique orientée vers la conduite des individus et des populations, par des dispositifs diffus d’intervention plutôt que par la contrainte directe. Imprégnée d’économie politique, elle vise à gérer et encadrer plutôt qu’à imposer. Plus récemment, la gouvernance, souvent présentée comme neutre et technique, réactive cette logique, mais en lui conférant une normativité implicite — celle d’une « bonne » manière de gouverner — là où Foucault en proposait une lecture critique et généalogique des formes de pouvoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropenSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207