MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416734646 · doi:10.1051/epjpv/2025019

Industrial implementation of 24%-efficient POLO IBC solar cells and future upgrade to 26%-efficient POLO <sup>2</sup> IBC

2025· article· en· W4416734646 on OpenAlex
Thorsten Dullweber, Yevgeniya Larionova, Philip Jäger, Verena Mertens, Sabrina Schimanke, Melanie Ripke, Ulrike Baumann, Alaa Osman, Udo Römer, Robby Peibst, Rolf Brendel, Özlem Coşkun, Gamze Çekerek, Meriç Çalişkan Arslan, Geoffrey Gregory, Erik H. Hoffmann, Massimo Centazzo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEPJ Photovoltaics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Gender and HealthHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeLeibniz-GemeinschaftGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und EnergieEuropean Commission
KeywordsPassivationCommon emitterWaferPhotovoltaic systemSolar cellHeterojunction bipolar transistorPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IBC solar cells have gained tremendous interest in the PV industry as next-generation technology. ISFH has developed a lean manufacturing process sequence for POLO IBC solar cells applying p-type Cz wafers, an Al-BSF base contact and local PECVD deposition of the SiO x N y /n-type polysilicon emitter through a glass shadow mask. In this paper, we report a new best POLO IBC cell efficiency of 24.5% processed at ISFH on M2 wafer size. In 2024, we started to transfer the POLO IBC process from the ISFH SolarTeC to the Kalyon PV manufacturing line using their M10 sized p-type Ga-doped Cz wafers and cell production tools. With Kalyon PV's wet chemistry and PECVD AlO x /SiN tools good surface passivation is demonstrated by obtaining an iV oc up to 727 mV using textured, rear side polished AlO x /SiN passivated test wafers. Kalyon PV targets to process first M10-sized POLO IBC solar cells till end of 2025. However, the POLO IBC efficiency will be limited to below 25.5% by the carrier recombination at the Al-BSF base contact. To overcome this limitation aiming at n-type poly / p-type polysilicon POLO 2 IBC cell efficiencies beyond 26%, EnPV and ISFH optimized a carrier selective SiO x /p-type polysilicon layer stack yielding a new best median saturation current density J 0 = 4 ± 1 fA/cm 2 using industrial tools for the wet chemically grown SiO x and the in-situ doped p-type polysilicon layer. ISFH is applying the SiO x /p-type polysilicon layer stack to develop a novel industrial processing sequence for the POLO 2 IBC solar cell. We deposit both polysilicon layers in-situ-doped full-area and laser-structure both polysilicon polarities. Using lab-type tools and p-type float zone (FZ) wafers, a small-area POLO 2 IBC solar cell with 25.5% efficiency has been developed at ISFH. Using M2-sized n-type Cz wafers, a novel IBC trench patterning process, and solely industrial processing tools in the ISFH SolarTeC targeting very cost-effective processes for etch barrier formation, laser structuring, and polysilicon etching, we obtain a measured implied V oc = 735 mV of POLO 2 IBC cells processed without metal contacts. Since the polysilicon contacts minimize carrier recombination at metal contacts, the implied V oc value demonstrates the high V oc potential of this promising new POLO 2 IBC manufacturing process thereby indicating a conversion efficiency potential above 26%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it