MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416734703 · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf628

Transcriptome Transformer: improving patient survival prediction via multitask learning of transcriptomic and clinical features

2025· article· en· W4416734703 on OpenAlexaff
Bonil Koo, Inyoung Sung, Sangseon Lee, Sun Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueBriefings in Bioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsTranscriptomeSource codeRepresentation (politics)Clinical PracticePerspective (graphical)Feature learningMulti-task learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate survival prediction is essential in healthcare as it guides treatment strategies and improves patient outcomes. While clinical features provide valuable prognostic information, they often fail to represent the molecular complexity of diseases. Transcriptomic data, which reflects gene expression patterns of tumors, present a complementary perspective to address this limitation. We introduce Transcriptome Transformer (TxT), a multitask learning framework that uses a transcriptome-centric approach to improve patient survival prediction. TxT employs a Transformer-based architecture with multihead attention mechanisms to effectively capture complex dependencies among genes, enabling dynamic modeling of gene-gene interactions while using shared information across multiple clinical prediction tasks. By jointly analyzing transcriptomic data and incorporating clinical features, TxT offers a more complete representation of patient biology. In experiments across both single-task and multitask datasets, TxT outperformed existing methods in survival prediction and related clinical tasks. Additionally, TxT offers biological insights through attention-derived gene interaction networks, identifying immune-related pathways in longer-surviving Luminal A patients and coagulation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathways in shorter-surviving counterparts. Differential attention analysis further revealed that integrating clinical features enhances the model's ability to prioritize genes involved in biologically meaningful pathways that are known to influence tumor progression and distant recurrence. The source code of TxT is available at https://github.com/BonilKoo/TxT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBriefings in BioinformaticsSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207