MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416738026 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.05.686773

<i>In situ</i> Architecture of the Tad Pilus Machine in <i>Caulobacter crescentus</i>

2025· preprint· en· W4416738026 on OpenAlexafffund
James Iarocci, Gregory B. Whitfield, Ryu F Williston, Michael R. Wozny, John F. Presley, Courtney K. Ellison, Yves V. Brun, Shuaiqi Guo

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
FundersFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNational Institutes of HealthMcGill UniversityFaculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPilusModel organismBiofilmOrganismMechanism (biology)Bacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Tight adherence (Tad) pilus is a broadly distributed and evolutionarily distinct subclass of type IV pili that mediates cell adhesion, biofilm formation, predation, and surface sensing in many bacteria, including Caulobacter crescentus , Myxococcus xanthus , Vibrio vulnificus , and Bifidobacterium breve . Tad pili undergo cycles of extension and retraction powered by a cell-envelope-embedded nanomachine. Despite their biological importance, the architecture and assembly mechanism of the Tad pilus system have remained poorly understood. Although cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) has elucidated the in situ structures of other type IV pilus systems, no intact Tad machine structure has previously been reported. Here, we use cryo-ET and subtomogram averaging to resolve the near-native architecture of the C. crescentus Tad pilus within the bacterial cell envelope. 3D classification further reveals multiple assembly intermediates, and integrative modelling incorporating AlphaFold3 predictions help define the spatial arrangement of all core components. The resulting structural framework gives insight into the stepwise assembly process of the C. crescentus Tad pilus machine. Altogether, our results provide an in situ architectural model of the Tad pilus machine, establishing a foundation for understanding homologous systems across a broad range of bacteria. Importance Investigating the Tad pilus nanomachine in a genetically tractable, non-pathogenic organism like Caulobacter crescentus provides a powerful model for elucidating the architecture and functional dynamics of this widespread system. Insights gained from studying the Tad machinery can improve our understanding of related Tad pilus systems in pathogenic bacteria such as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans , where Tad pili are a key determinant of biofilm formation and chronic infection. Additionally, the remarkable functional diversity of Tad systems, ranging from surface sensing in C. crescentus to bacterial predation in M. xanthus , highlights their broad biological relevance. By revealing the in situ structure and assembly mechanism of the Tad pilus biosynthetic machinery, this study advances our understanding of a major class of bacterial nanomachines and may thus provide structural insights that could inform the development of new therapeutic strategies targeting pilus-mediated virulence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing→French-language works237,207→