Effects of the combination of spray dried plasma and reduced crude protein in diets on growth performance, diarrhea scores, gut morphology, and immune parameters of weanling pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hypothesis that spray dried plasma (SDP) complements low crude protein (CP) phase 1 diets by improving growth performance, decreasing diarrhea, reducing immune system activation, and maintaining intestinal health of weanling pigs was tested. Four phase 1 diets were formulated (CP: 18.5% or 23.0%; SDP: 0% or 6%). One-hundred and sixty weaned pigs (5.89 ± 0.39 kg; 20 ± 2 days) were fed one of the four phase 1 diets (days 1–14) and a phase 2 diet (days 15–28). Results indicated that pigs fed the 18.5% CP diet instead of the 23.0% CP diet had reduced ( P < 0.05) average daily gain (ADG) and gain to feed ratio (G:F), and pigs fed 6% SDP had greater ( P < 0.05) ADG and G:F than pigs fed no SDP. Diarrhea scores were reduced ( P < 0.05) for pigs fed the 18.5% CP diet. Villus height in the ileum and mucosa width in the colon increased if SDP was included in the 23.0% CP diet, but not in the 18.5% CP diet (interaction, P < 0.05). In conclusion, including 6% SDP in phase 1 diets resulted in improved ADG and G:F and reduced inflammatory responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".