MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integrating Building Performance Simulation in Agent-based Models to Support Demand-side Management Strategies

2025· article· W4416743012 on OpenAlexafffund
Yao Lu, William O’Brien, Elie Azar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSetpointRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemEnergy managementDemand responseBuilding energy simulationTariffEfficient energy useKey (lock)Workflow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Demand-side management (DSM) strategies are essential for addressing critical energy challenges, and agent-based modeling (ABM) has emerged as a promising approach to model and inform DSM strategies. However, existing models often overlook the dynamic nature of building performance due to simplified building systems’ representation. This paper proposes a novel workflow that equips an agent-based model of a group of buildings with integrated building performance simulation (BPS) capabilities, coupled with supply-side energy modeling, to enable comprehensive testing of DSM strategies. A case study is conducted to compare decentralized and centralized renewable energy supply systems, alongside the evaluation of DSM strategies such as setpoint control during peak hours and tariff-based incentives. Key performance indicators – including solar energy self-consumption, self-sufficiency rate, surplus ratio, and peak load ratio – are used to assess the effectiveness of these strategies. Results indicate that (i) centralized renewable energy scenarios achieve 4–5% higher solar energy self-consumption rates compared to decentralized scenarios, (ii) setpoint control during peak hours reduces peak load ratio by 0.7%, and (iii) tariff incentives unexpectedly increase peak loads due to shifting demand to evening peaks. The proposed model serves as a proof of concept for the dynamic and integrated modeling of energy demand and renewable energy generation needed to test DSM strategies at the community scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207