MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intersectional stigma, health behaviors, and allostatic load among sexual and gender diverse people

2025· article· en· W4416746406 on OpenAlexafffund
Névéna Chuntova, Inès Ait Abdelmalek, Karine Lavallée-Rodrigue, Emma-Rose Thériault, Ziad Guenoun, Jasmine Boulette, Ahmed Jérôme Romain, L. Zachary DuBois, Robert‐Paul Juster

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychoneuroendocrinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAllostatic loadPsychosocialTransgenderMinority stressSexual orientationHealth equitySexual minorityStigma (botany)Poverty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sexual and gender diverse (SGD) people face significant health disparities linked to chronic stigma exposure. Yet, the biological mechanisms underlying these inequities remain unexplored. This project examines how lifetime intersectional discrimination influences allostatic load (AL) —the cumulative biological 'wear and tear' of chronic stress—and explores the role of health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, drug use, sleep quality and physical activity) as potential mediators in this pathway. Our team recruited 357 adults separated into 7 subgroups stratified by gender identity and sexual orientation. Blood samples and biometrics were collected from each participant and analysed to create a composite AL index incorporating 16 biomarkers across multiple physiological systems. Psychosocial variables including intersectional discrimination experiences and health behaviors were derived from validated questionnaires. Results show that intersectional discrimination experiences were positively associated with AL after controlling for age, indicating that both major discriminatory events and cumulative daily experiences independently contribute to physiological dysregulation through enacted stigma and discrimination exposure. Additionally, both gender identity and sexual orientation relate to differential AL patterns, with masculine-spectrum people (cisgender and transgender men) and sexual minority men (bisexual and gay men) showing the highest AL levels. Contrary to our hypothesis, health behaviors did not mediate the relationship between discrimination and AL, suggesting that discrimination may exert direct biological effects through stress response systems without requiring negative behavioral pathways. These findings provide further support for recognition of the impacts of structural and social determinants of health among SGD communities and the need for policy changes that protect against structural inequities. • Transgender and cisgender men show the highest allostatic load levels; cisgender women show the lowest • Bisexual and gay men demonstrate the highest allostatic load levels among all sexual orientation groups • Both major lifetime discrimination and day-to-day lifetime discrimination independently predict allostatic load levels • Health behaviors do not mediate the major discrimination-allostatic load associations in this sample • Age emerges as the strongest predictor of physiological stress burden across groups

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychoneuroendocrinologySame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207