A unified transcriptome dataset for Amaryllidoideae species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Amaryllidoideae plants produce structurally diverse and unique alkaloids with potent anti-cholinesterase, antiviral, and antitumor activities, making this subfamily a rich source of pharmaceutical leads. Despite the absence of reference genomes for any Amaryllidoideae species, many enzyme characterization and pathway reconstruction efforts to date have been made possible through transcriptome mining, often requiring bioinformatic expertise and data preprocessing. To facilitate new studies in this subfamily, here we present AmarylOmicBase, a unified transcriptomic dataset that integrates assemblies, annotations, and expression profiles from 39 studies, covering 27 species and four hybrid cultivars across 13 genera of Amaryllidoideae. The AmarylOmicBase includes both published and de novo assemblies generated from published raw data using Trinity or IsoSeq workflows and provides standardized functional annotation and quantitative expression datasets. AmarylOmicBase provides ready-to-use datasets that support gene discovery, comparative transcriptomics, and pathway-level investigations for specialized metabolism, including Amaryllidaceae alkaloid biosynthesis. By providing ready-to-use datasets and fully reproducible analysis scripts, this resource reduces computational barriers and expands access to transcriptomic information for researchers working on non-model plant species. AmarylOmicBase provides a centralized resource for transcriptomic data that can be reused in studies of enzyme function, pathway evolution, and regulatory processes in Amaryllidoideae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".