From Speech to Sonography: Spectral Networks for Ultrasound Microstructure Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The frequency dependence of backscattered radiofrequency (RF) signals produced by ultrasound scanners carries rich information related to the tissue microstructure (i.e., scatterer size, attenuation). This information can be sue to classify tissues based on microstructural changes associated to disease onset and progression. Conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can learn this information directly from radio-frequency (RF) data, but they often struggle to achieve adequate frequency selectivity. This increases model complexity and convergence time, and limits generalization. To overcome these challenges, SincNet, originally developed for speech processing, was adapted to classify RF data based on differences in frequency properties. Rather than learning every filter coefficient, SincNet only learns each filter's low frequency and bandwidth, dramatically reducing the number of parameters and improving frequency resolution. For model interpretability, a GradientWeighted Filter Contribution is introduced, which highlights the importance of spectral bands. The approach was validated on three datasets: simulated data with different scatterer sizes, experimental phantom data, and in vivo data of rats which were fed a methionine and choline- deficient diet to develop liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. The modified SincNet consistently achieved the best results in material/tissue classifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".