TagGuideBot: Enhancing Robot Intelligence with Object Tags and VLMs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to enhance the interaction between humans and robots, especially in environments with multiple similar objects or semantic ambiguities. Traditional command-based interactions typically require users to provide precise descriptions, which often poses a significant challenge. To address this issue, we propose a framework named Tag-GuideBot, which leverages Visual Language Models (VLMs) and utilizes object markers to help locate and identify objects in the environment. By integrating positional point prompts of the target objects with robot motion planning models, we aim to achieve a more accurate understanding and execution of complex commands, thus improving the efficiency and naturalness of interactions. Experimental results demonstrate that TagGuideBot effectively addresses the challenges posed by complex commands and environmental complexities, achieving an accuracy of 66.3% on user instructions extended beyond the training set, providing solid support for further optimization of human-robot interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it