RALAD: Bridging the Real-to-Sim Domain Gap in Autonomous Driving with Retrieval-Augmented Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As end-to-end autonomous driving advances toward real-world deployment, ensuring the safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs) has become a critical requirement for their commercial viability. While rule-based AVs have traditionally undergone rigorous testing in both real-world and simulated environments before deployment, data-driven autonomous models are typically trained on real-world datasets, limiting their generalization to simulation environments. This poses a significant challenge for the development and testing of end-to-end autonomous driving. To address this issue, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Learning for Autonomous Driving (RALAD), a novel framework designed to bridge the real-to-sim gap in a cost-effective manner. RALAD consists of three key components: (1) domain adaptation via an enhanced Optimal Transport (OT) method, which retrieves the most similar scenarios between real and simulated environments; (2) feature fusion across similar scenarios, enabling the construction of a feature mapping between real-world and simulated domains; and (3) feature extraction freezing with fine-tuning on the fused features, allowing the model to learn simulation-specific characteristics through feature mapping. We evaluate RALAD on three monocular 3D object detection models, and the results demonstrate that our approach significantly improves model accuracy in simulation. Additionally, we use real autonomous vehicle for testing in real-world scenarios, and have established simulated scenes similar to reality for further testing, which illustrate the effectiveness of our method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".