MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416750307 · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3637944

Multimodal Measurement Framework for Thunderstorm Charge Motion: Spatiotemporal Sensor Fusion With Bayesian-Optimized Localization

2025· article· W4416750307 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Xu, Hongyan Xing, Fa Zhu, Yong Chen, David Camacho, Xudong Dong, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRadarThunderstormSensor fusionFeature (linguistics)SmoothingPattern recognition (psychology)LidarFeature extractionRadar imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate measurement of thunderstorm cloud point charge motion is critical for analyzing thunderstorm dynamics but remains challenging due to the limitations of single-modal atmospheric electric field (AEF) data. This paper presents an enhanced multimodal sensor fusion framework that synergizes three-dimensional (3D) AEF measurements with radar echo intensity (REI) and precipitation data. The methodology introduces several key instrumentation advancements: 1) A spatiotemporal calibration method that resolves the sampling rate conflict (1s AEF vs. 6min radar) and incorporates two AEF features other than statistics—amplitude of change and zero-crossing time—to better capture non-stationary AEF signal dynamics; 2) A physics-constrained feature fusion strategy that integrates the AEF features with REI and precipitation data, followed by a Cohen’s d-based selection to construct a highly discriminative feature vector; 3) A multi-objective Bayesian optimization scheme for the random forest model, simultaneously minimizing classification error and model complexity; and 4) A trajectory post-processing module that applies smoothing and denoising to the 3D point charge localization results, yielding physically plausible motion paths. Validated against multiple weather events, the framework demonstrates superior performance in weather attribute classification and achieves dynamic, high-fidelity visualization of charge trajectories that show strong consistency with independent radar observations, establishing a new channel for extreme weather monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207