MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Collaborative Swarm Shape Reconstruction of Tumbling Space Targets via Decentralized Dynamic Factor Graph Optimization

2025· article· W4416750685 on OpenAlexaff
El Ghali Asri, Zheng Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsSpacecraftSwarm behaviourParametric statisticsDynamic mode decompositionScalabilitySimultaneous localization and mappingRegularization (linguistics)Point cloud

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On-orbit servicing (OOS) has become an essential aspect of modern space missions, encompassing satellite maintenance, orbital assembly, and debris removal. This paper presents a novel decentralized navigation algorithm designed for a swarm of servicing spacecraft to collaboratively reconstruct the shape of unknown tumbling space objects. The proposed method leverages a dynamic factor graph-based Collaborative Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (C-SLAM) framework, integrating observed and identified point cloud features across the swarm. To address the challenges associated with the target’s tumbling dynamics, the approach also incorporates a dynamic SLAM formulation, utilizing a noisy parametric model to propagate the dynamic map and construct the dynamic factor graph at the front-end. Kinematic factors are introduced to account for loop closures, enabling the swarm to recognize previously observed features as they rotate with the target, thereby enhancing mapping robustness. Additionally, the target kinematic model parameters themselves—such as its center of mass, linear velocity, and angular velocity—are estimated in real time from the reconstructed maps. The latter notably is estimated using a singular value decomposition approach that determine the best fit rotation between two consecutive sets of mapped points. These estimates are fed back into the kinematic factors and loop closure processes to refine map optimization iteratively. Simulation results demonstrate that incorporating kinematic factors, addressing loop closures, and facilitating inter-robot communication significantly enhance the swarm’s ability to track the evolving map without a central leader. This decentralized approach highlights the potential of equipping spacecraft swarms with advanced, robust, and scalable perception capabilities for the collaborative inspection and characterization of unknown tumbling space targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207