MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LMI-Based $\mathcal{H}_{\infty}$ Fuzzy T-S Compensator for Intermodulation Distortion in Power Amplifiers

2025· article· W4416750896 on OpenAlexaff
Cristiano Quevedo Andrea, Bruno Sereni, Edson Antonio Batista, J. A. P. Lima, Fabrizio Leonardi, Mauro Conti Pereira

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)IntermodulationNonlinear distortionDistortion (music)AmplifierNonlinear systemFuzzy logicConvex optimizationNorm (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power amplifiers (PAs) exhibit an intrinsic nonlinear behavior that can hinder their application to highpower radio frequency transmission. Such characteristic of PAs produces severe output signal distortion when the input signal achieves a certain amplitude, thereby limiting their efficiency to maintain a linear behavior. This problem becomes critical with modern technologies, such as 5 G or 6 G, which employ wide-bandwidth signals, thus implying drastic spectral regrowth phenomena and intermodulation distortion (IMD). In practical terms, the PA spectral efficiency is degraded and the input information becomes corrupted. This paper proposes a control system design based on reference tracking to address this problem. The input-output mapping of a PA is modeled through a state-space representation derived from a classical Volterra series. Then we employ fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) representation to exactly describe the nonlinear behavior of the PA in terms of a convex combination of linear local models. This approach enables the design of a fuzzy dynamic output feedback controller using linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) and considering the minimization of the$\mathcal{H}_{\infty}$norm between the input reference and the PA output. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed technique is able to mitigate the open-loop PA distortion effects, as evidenced by the attenuation of IMD components, especially within the input signal bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207