MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416756651 · doi:10.5931/djim.v19i1.12708

Information Reputation(s): Swifties, super fans, and their information seeking behaviours

2025· article· W4416756651 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Sam VanNorden

Bibliographic record

VenueDalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia Influence and Health
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsInformation seekingSocial mediaPleasureInformation scienceSwiftInformation seeking behaviorIconProcess (computing)Information system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the information seeking behaviours of super fans, specifically fans of Taylor Swift, and their respective behaviours of knowledge collecting and sharing. While fandom studies are well established in cultural and media scholarship, the information seeking behaviours of fans (how they search for, interpret, and share knowledge) is relatively underexplored in a Library and Information Science (LIS) context. This paper addresses this gap by examining Swifties (fans of Taylor Swift) as a case study to demonstrate how fan-based information practices complicate and expand traditional understandings of Human Information Interaction (HII), particularly where affect, identity, and pleasure are central motivations. This study then examines the way that Swifties both search for and receive information about her as methods of personal fulfillment. Additionally, this study builds on HII models by mobilizing post-modern theory to both highlight the figure of the icon and to study information behaviours that, for the most part, are produced for the sake of it (for joy and pleasure). The methods used in this study are grounded in the sense-making model offered by Brenda Dervin and deploys Information World Mapping (IWM) techniques during the interview process with participants to explore their information practices. Participants illustrated and discussed how they locate, evaluate, and share information about Taylor Swift across multiple platforms and contexts. Findings indicate that social media functions as the primary hub for Swiftie information seeking, facilitating both individual sense-making and community connection. Participants described verifying information through Taylor Swift’s own media outputs, interpreting “Easter eggs” embedded in her work, and linking their fan practices to processes of identity formation and leisure. The results suggest that Swifties’ information behaviours are motivated by joy, fulfillment, and self-expression, and demonstrates how fandom contexts extend HII frameworks to include identity-driven motivations, positioning the pop culture icon not only as subject but also as information system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary ManagementSame topicMedia Influence and HealthFrench-language works237,207