A Developmental Table for the Florida Carpenter Ant 𝘊𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘶𝘴 𝘧𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘶𝘴: Establishing Foundations for Mechanistic Studies of Development and Evolution in Ants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developmental staging tables have been essential tools for understanding morphogenesis, gene regulation, and evolutionary change across animal taxa. However, such frameworks are lacking for many species, which are relevant for answering key questions in the fields of ecology, evolutionary, and developmental biology. Here, we present a comprehensive developmental table for the carpenter ant _Camponotus floridanus_, an emerging model system for understanding how ecological environment, eusocial systems, endosymbionts, and organismal development interact and influence each other. Our staging spans embryonic, larval, and pupal development, combining high-resolution and time-lapse imaging to document key events from egg to adult. Stages are defined based on conserved features of insect embryogenesis, including nuclear division, cellularization, gastrulation, germband elongation, segmentation, and dorsal closure. _C. floridanus_ has evolved novel, species-specific developmental features, largely driven by its endosymbiosis with the bacteria _Blochmannia_. Despite this, we successfully identified several homologous landmarks that are conserved with those of other ants, including the Pharoah ant _Monomorium pharaonis_, as well as the fruit fly _Drosophila melanogaster_. We characterized 17 embryonic stages and four larval instars in worker castes. We identified diagnostic traits for each larval instar and revealed a system for determining developmental windows necessary for mechanistic studies at the larval stage. Finally, we characterized the daily morphological changes observed during pupal development, an understudied phase in ant development for understanding caste differentiation. This framework will provide a foundational reference for mechanistic studies in ecological evolutionary developmental Biology (eco-evo-devo) in ants and other insects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".