MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416763998 · doi:10.1186/s12939-025-02617-w

Assessing health disparities faced by female paid domestic workers in Peru before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic

2025· article· en· W4416763998 on OpenAlexafffund
David Vera-Tudela, María Kathia Cárdenas, Ramón Díaz, Christopher Meaney, María Lazo‐Porras, Viviana Cruzado, Archna Gupta, Janeth Tenorio‐Mucha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Equity in Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsSocial policyPandemicPublic healthHealth services researchHealth equityHealth policySocial securityCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Sustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Female paid domestic workers are among the most vulnerable occupational groups globally, often lacking formal social protection and limited labour rights. The COVID-19 pandemic may have exacerbated these vulnerabilities, yet quantitative evidence from low and middle income countries is scarce. This study examines health disparities in Peru between female paid domestic workers and females employed in the formal service sector before, during, and after the pandemic. METHODS: We used pooled cross sectional data from the Peruvian National Household Survey (ENAHO, 2018-2023). The primary outcomes were self reported illness symptoms and healthcare seeking behaviour. We compared female paid domestic workers to female formal workers in other service occupations-including both personal and nonpersonal services-across three time periods: prepandemic (January 2018 - February 2020), pandemic (March 2020 - October 2022), and postpandemic (November 2022 - December 2023). Analyses involved comparing differences in proportions and conducting Wald tests. We also stratified results by key social determinants of health, including education, ethnicity, age, income, chronic disease status, household head status, and access to labour rights. RESULTS: Female paid domestic workers reported more illness symptoms and sought less healthcare than females working in nonpersonal service roles, especially during the pandemic. The difference in proportions - 5.9 percentage points (pp.) for illness symptoms and 16.5 pp. for healthcare-seeking behaviour- became smaller after one year. There were no significant differences when comparing female paid domestic workers to other personal service workers. Stratified results indicated that outcome differences between female paid domestic workers and female working in non-personal services were wider among household heads, those with chronic conditions, and those with limited access to labour rights. Post-pandemic disparities were especially pronounced among younger females, low-wage earners, and those with less education. CONCLUSION: In Peru, female paid domestic workers experienced persistent health disadvantages before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with females with formal employment. Addressing these disparities requires comprehensive policies that promote formalization and social security coverage to advance progress on Sustainable Development Goal 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Equity in HealthSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207