MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416765329 · doi:10.63332/joph.v5i11.3697

Evaluating the Impact of Radiologic Procedures on Nursing Care Planning and Patient Recovery Outcomes

2025· article· W4416765329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Posthumanism · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiology practices and education
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursing careHealth informaticsPatient careHealth careMEDLINEInformaticsNursing Outcomes ClassificationInclusion (mineral)Radiation treatment planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Radiologic procedures are essential in today's healthcare system, affecting the whole process from diagnosis through treatment to recovery. The radiologic competency of the hospital, the risk management strategy, and the patient education will all depend on the imaging results. Hence, it is a must to know the radiology-nursing interaction in order to increase safety, improve communication and recovery outcomes. Objective: The review was intended to highlight the current practices, challenges, and opportunities for improvement in clinical and patient-centered outcomes by evaluating the impact of diagnostic as well as interventional radiologic procedures on nursing care planning and patient recovery. Methods: The authors performed a narrative literature review using PubMed and Google Scholar to locate peer-reviewed articles that were published within the time frame of January 2020 to September 2024. The search was done by employing the combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords related to radiologic procedures, nursing care, and patient recovery. The articles that were chosen for inclusion in the review were the ones that had provided quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research, systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines centered on nursing roles in imaging, interdisciplinary coordination, and recovery outcomes. Results: The data extracted resulted in the identification of five main themes: 1) clinical nursing roles in pre- and post-procedure care, 2) interventional radiology and patient monitoring, 3) communication and education strategies, 4) technological integration, including informatics and imaging analytics, and 5) space barriers of limited training, ethical concerns, and communication gaps. It is a common viewpoint that the coordination of radiologic-nursing practices leads to an increase in the safety, satisfaction, and recovery of patients, but the total implementation across all hospitals is still in progress. Conclusion: Radiologic procedures are vital not only in the nursing care process but also in the recovery outcomes. To maximize the impact of radiology on nursing, comprehensive training, interdisciplinary coordination, and consistent hospital policies across departments are few of the ways

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it