MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantitative analysis of iron residue in potassium hydroxide: A time-dependent study

2025· article· en· W4416767908 on OpenAlexafffund
Bowen Wang, Parastoo Mouchani, Donald W. Kirk, Steven J. Thorpe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrolysisPotassium hydroxideElectrolyteDissolutionPotassiumElectrodeQuantitative analysis (chemistry)HydroxideContamination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron (Fe) contamination in potassium hydroxide (KOH) poses a significant challenge for the reliability of membrane based alkaline electrolysis systems (AEMWE) due to its influence on electrocatalytic behaviour and system stability. The dissolution of Fe from cell components or as an electrolyte impurity can affect membrane resistivity, produce short circuit pathways, and result in anomalous deposition within the system. The objective of this study is to compare various benchmark purification methods and develop a simple, effective, and accelerated protocol for Fe removal using a 3 electrode Pt-mesh setup. Fe residues in KOH were quantified using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) over a 24-h pre-electrolysis period. The results indicated that Fe levels dropped significantly within the first two hours of pre-electrolysis. By combining acid washing and holding at open-circuit potential (OCP) in Fe-free KOH, Pt mesh was shown to be capable of reducing Fe levels in contaminated KOH solutions to near-zero levels within 2 h. • Pre-electrolysis protocol reduces Fe in KOH to near zero levels in under 2 h. • Pt mesh is an effective and highly reusable electrode for purifying KOH. • Iron deposits onto Pt rapidly within the first 30 min of pre-electrolysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electroanalytical ChemistrySame topicMembrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207