Are orexin antagonists capable of improving both insomnia and vasomotor symptoms in menopausal women?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The menopausal period in women is characterized by neuroendocrine alterations, which is in part mediated by the reduction in circulating estrogen. During this transition, many perimenopausal and menopausal women experience sleep disturbances and increased susceptibility to sleep-related disorders. Sleep disruptions are partially attributed to nighttime vasomotor symptoms (VMS), which exacerbates the insomnia risk in the menopausal woman. Converging data implicate the orexin system in the pathophysiology of insomnia and VMS, particularly through regulation of arousal, thermoregulation, and sympathetic outputs. Estrogen decline due to menopause is postulated to modulate orexin signaling, thereby heightening sympathetic drive and thermoregulatory instability. Given this potential mechanistic framework, orexin receptor antagonists, notably dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), have been proposed as alternative menopausal therapeutics. Herein, we aim to examine preclinical, translation, and clinical literature assessing the therapeutic potentials of DORAs as a nonhormonal intervention for the mitigation of insomnia and VMS in midlife women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".