MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical investigation of synergistic effects of nanopulsed plasma and water addition on hydrogen combustion and NO emissions

2025· article· en· W4416772902 on OpenAlexaff
Ghazanfar Mehdi, Mihiran Pathmika Galagedarage Don, Hafiz Ali Haider Sehole, Ossi Kaario, Zubair Ali Shah, Muhammad Basit Chandio, Maria Grazia De Giorgi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersAalto-YliopistoEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsCombustionIgnition systemPlasmaHydrogenRadicalAutoignition temperatureWater vaporNonthermal plasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a novel integrated approach using nanopulsed repetitively pulsed discharge (NRPD) plasma with H 2 /H 2 O/Air mixtures to overcome high NO emissions and ignition delay timing (IDT) in hydrogen combustion, utilizing zero-dimensional ChemPlasKin simulations and Design of Experiments (DoE). A key finding is that while water vapor inhibits conventional autoignition, plasma-assisted ignition (PAI) is insensitive to water, as plasma dissociates H 2 O into reactive radicals (H, O, OH), effectively turning water into an ignition promoter and enhancing early radical formation. PAI achieves significantly lower flame temperatures (12.3 % reduction) and approximately 58 % lower NO emissions compared to conventional autoignition through non-thermal chemical pathways. Comparative analysis quantified that plasma kinetic effects play a dominant role in reducing IDT, contributing substantially more to enhancement than plasma thermal effects alone. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis of NO formation revealed that water vapor significantly alters the kinetics of NO-related reactions, changing the sensitivity and role of key pathways like H + NO 2 ⇌ NO + OH, suggesting water can reverse certain reactions from producing NO to consuming it. This plasma-water synergy successfully broadens and stabilizes low-NO combustion regimes. • Plasma–water synergy cuts NO x emissions by up to 58 % vs autoignition. • NRPD plasma offsets water's inhibition, cutting ignition delay. • Plasma lowers flame temperature ∼12.3 %, limiting thermal NO x . • Water generates radicals (H, O, OH) in plasma, boosting ignition. • DoE optimization conditions for stable, low-NO x hydrogen combustion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hydrogen EnergySame topicPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207