Explore generation mechanisms of unsteady large-amplitude wind-induced response in stay cables by delayed detached eddy simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The generation mechanisms of unsteady large-amplitude wind-induced vibrations in bridge stay cables under no precipitation condition are numerically studied through simulations of flow around a circular cylinder at an attack angle of α = 30° and Re = 10 4 . Delayed detached eddy simulation is performed in OpenFOAM 4.1 on a 4.1-million-cell O-type mesh to explore flow characteristics in the wake of a cylinder and the role of different vortical structures in triggering unstable aerodynamic responses. Results reveal that the axial flow formed on the leeward side of an inclined cylinder plays a key role in producing low-frequency excitations resulted from the intermittent interaction between axial vortex and conventional von Kármán vortex, leading to an intermittent amplification of von Kármán vortex shedding and thus the sectional lift. Such an intermittent intensification of sectional lift is found to propagate along the cylinder span at a speed matching the axial component of the oncoming flow velocity. Together, the intermittent amplification of von Kármán vortex shedding and the spanwise convection of enhanced sectional lift at the speed of axial flow introduces a marked low-frequency peak in the lift force spectrum. Further, the intensified sectional lift is observed to propagate along the cylinder span following an S-shaped wavy pattern. These identified unique features of flow around an inclined circular cylinder are believed to be the cause of the low-frequency component motion contained in the wind-induced unsteady responses of dry inclined stay cables reported from bridge sites and wind tunnel studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".