MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416781138 · doi:10.1016/j.esmorw.2025.100601

405P Optimizing prognostic models for early breast cancer (EBC) recurrence using real-world data (RWD) and machine learning (ML)

2025· article· en· W4416781138 on OpenAlexaff
Frederick M. Howard, P.A. Fasching, C.A. Santa-Maria, J. A. Sparano, Maryam B. Lustberg, T. Bachelot, Oleg Blyuss, Christine Brezden‐Masley, Y.H. Park, J. Sirieix, Fayin Ye, Patricia Domínguez Castro, Christoph Kurz, Pedram Razavi

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrognostic modelRisk assessmentPredictive modellingBreast cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk of recurrence remains a concern for patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− EBC. Prognostic ML models using RWD can support risk estimation; however, the optimal balance between model complexity, interpretability, and accuracy is not well defined. We developed and evaluated ML models of increasing complexity to predict distant recurrence (DR) in pts with EBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO Real World Data and Digital OncologySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207