MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416783072 · doi:10.4000/15886

Chapitre VIII. Le sensible et le réel

2025· book-chapter· fr· W4416783072 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Rennes eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMarxism and Critical Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMEDLINESet (abstract data type)Time line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le contenu de ce type de réalisme perceptuelOn pourrait résumer le contenu de cette importante variante de réalisme perceptuel d’une formule provocatrice : être perçu c’est être réel, ou dit de manière moins paradoxale : il n’y a de perception que de la réalité. Telle est l’option choisie, entre autres, par Charles Travis qui, aujourd’hui, prolonge une forme de réalisme héritée de l’école dite d’Oxford : celui d’Austin au premier chef, de Gilbe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Rennes eBooksSame topicMarxism and Critical TheoryFrench-language works237,207