MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416783953 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26851-y

Household exposure, demographic and health characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort study in Northern France

2025· article· en· W4416783953 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon Galmiche, Laurie Pinaud, Laura Tondeur, Stéphane Pelleau, Mikaël Attia, Sandrine Castelain, Isabelle Staropoli, Cécile Duru, Aymar Davy Koffi, Sandrine Fernandes‐Pellerin, Nathalie Jolly, Emmanuel Roux, Olivier Schwartz, Sylvie van der Werf, Michael White, Arnaud Fontanet

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFondation de FranceInstitut PasteurFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheAgence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites ViralesEuropean Commission
KeywordsCohort studyIncidence (geometry)CohortPopulationEpidemiologyPublic healthYoung adultProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this cohort study, we aimed to study the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its association with household exposure, as well as demographic and health factors. Between March 2020 and April 2022, we conducted a cohort study among adults and children aged 5 years or more in a town in northern France. Participants were screened repeatedly for post-infection anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity. Infection dates were inferred in hierarchical order from symptomatic episodes or virological tests, or if unavailable from the timing of other cases in the household or the window of seroconversion. Household exposure to a case of SARS-CoV-2 during the infectious phase was defined as a time-varying exposure. We included 830 participants with a mean follow-up of 453 days (12,353 total person-months), during which we identified 491 infections (incidence rate 39.7 per 1,000 person-months). In adjusted analyses, exposure in the household to an infected individual was associated with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 16.48 (95% CI 12.29-22.09), and baseline statin use was associated with a decreased risk of infection (IRR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.89). These results could contribute to the development of additional prophylactic strategies, e.g., post-exposure, for the population at high risk of severe forms of COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies→French-language works237,207→