MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416783995 · doi:10.4000/157uq

Remerciements

2015· book-chapter· fr· W4416783995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Ann Caws, Anne Reynes-Delobel

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Liège eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCenter (category theory)Cultural heritageExhibitionWorld heritage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous tenons à remercier pour leur aide apportée dans la recherche des documents et l’acquisition des droits des images :En France : à Paris, Bibliothèque Jacques Doucet, la Bibliothèque nationale de France, Bibliothèque Kandinsky (Fonds Le Masle) Musée National d’Art Moderne. À Cerisy-la-Salle, Centre Culturel International de Cerisy. Au Royaume-Uni : Jersey Heritage Center (Jersey Museum). Au Canada : Parnall Collection et The Art Gallery of Greater Victoria

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.105
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.105
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2080.114

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Liège eBooksSame topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207