MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416785911 · doi:10.1242/dev.205242

Glial adherens junction proteins act with SAX-7/L1CAM to promote dendrite extension in <i>C. elegans</i>

2025· article· en· W4416785911 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth R. Cebul, Arthur Marivin, Leland R. Wexler, Paola N. Perrat, Claire Y. Bénard, Mikel Garcia‐Marcos, Maxwell G. Heiman

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersOffice of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAdherens junctionDendrite (mathematics)CadherinCiliumCell adhesion moleculeSignal transducing adaptor proteinCell junctionVinculin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adherens junctions (AJs) stabilize cell contacts by coupling adhesion molecules to the cytoskeleton. AJ proteins have been studied extensively in epithelia, but less is known about their roles in other cell types. Here, we describe a role for AJ proteins in C. elegans glia. Previously, we showed that C. elegans glia use the adhesion molecule SAX-7/L1CAM to anchor the dendritic endings of URX and BAG sensory neurons at the nose during embryo elongation, allowing their dendrites to stretch to their full lengths. Using cell-specific rescue and depletion experiments, we show that the AJ proteins MAGI-1 and HMR-1/Cadherin also act in glia to promote URX and BAG dendrite extension. MAGI-1 is a multi-PDZ domain protein that can simultaneously interact with PDZ-binding (PB) motifs in SAX-7 and HMP-2/β-catenin thus potentially bridging SAX-7 to the cadherin-catenin complex. The SAX-7 PB motif also binds AFD-1/afadin. Double-mutant analyses indicate that many of these players act redundantly, consistent with parallel interactions among them. As MAGI-1, HMR-1 and AFD-1 are all found in epithelial AJs, we propose that an AJ-like complex in glia promotes dendrite extension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmentSame topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsFrench-language works237,207