MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416789766 · doi:10.7202/1121814ar

Des groupes mobilisés derrière la conscription : les élites rimouskoises et le Camp 551

2025· article· fr· W4416789766 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Caroline D’Amours

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin d histoire politique · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvictionContext (archaeology)Power (physics)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article explore le rôle des élites rimouskoises dans la mise en place de la conscription pour le territoire national durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale (1939-1945), remettant en question l’idée d’un rejet uniforme par les Canadiens français. Il détaille la création du « Camp 55 », notamment grâce à l’implication d’acteurs locaux influents. Il révèle que leur engagement repose sur un mélange de patriotisme, d’intérêts économiques et moraux et la conviction des bienfaits de la discipline militaire. Enfin, l’étude montre que ces élites contribuent activement à l’effort de guerre canadien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin d histoire politiqueSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207