MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416793943 · doi:10.15407/book16-0018968

Economic, Social and Political Aspects of the Restoration of Cossack Ukraine after the End of the Ruin (last quarter of the 17th – beginning of the 18th century): lecture

2025· book· W4416793943 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Viktor Horobets

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsEliteQuarter (Canadian coin)State (computer science)UkrainianGovernment (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Value (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nature and components of the stabilization of the socio-political situation in Cossack Ukraine are analyzed as prerequisites for the restoration and development of the Hetmanate in the last quarter of the 17th – at the beginning of the 18th century. In particular, the influence of foreign policy factors on stability in Ukraine is established, and the ways in which the Hetman government mitigated the possible destructive consequences of external influence through relevant political and legal initiatives are reconstructed. In the context of analyzing the internal Ukrainian circumstances of the stabilization measures of the Hetman government, detailed consideration is given to the political steps taken to develop early modern estates-based democracy, reviving in the consciousness of the Cossack elite the value of the collective will of the Zaporozhian Host as an imperative norm for making important state decisions and overcoming the destructive influence of ochlocratic sentiments. The logic behind the Hetman government's actions in the field of economic policy is being clarified, primarily the establishment of new land relationships, as well as the formation of new social relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207