MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416794154 · doi:10.22399/ijcesen.4373

Risk-Based Alerting: Revolutionizing Cybersecurity Operations through Intelligent Threat Prioritization

2025· article· W4416794154 on OpenAlex
Vineeth Reddy Mandadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsSt. Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecurity information and event managementPhysical securityPrioritizationSecurity serviceSecurity through obscurityThreat assessmentStakeholderSecurity managementNetwork security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing challenge on the cybersecurity scene because conventional security monitoring systems generate excessive alert levels that are beyond the analysis capability of humans. The alert fatigue poses a security lapse where real security threats slip in unnoticed, and security teams are overwhelmed by floods of notifications. Risk-Based Approach is a radical remedy as it moves past the volume-based to the intelligence-based security operations, contextual scoring systems of the security events are based on the potential impact and the probability of happening, where the security events are ranked by priority. The technology combines various sources of data, such as network traffic logs, authentication logs, endpoint behavior logs, and threat intelligence feeds, to create a complete threat context. Companies that deploy Risk-Based Alerting frameworks report significant operational gains, such as the reduction of false positives by a significant margin, the improvement of Mean Time to Detect critical threats, the improvement of Mean Time to Respond, and yielding significant returns to investment. Its architecture has advanced correlation engines that have machine learning functionality, which refines risk models in real time with historical incident data and new patterns of threats. Its implementation will involve proper planning that will include the assessment of the assets inventory, establishing the baseline, stakeholder interactions, and extensive training of security analysts. The quantifiable advantages go beyond direct proportionality savings into next-generation operational advantages to lower costs of breach, higher compliance posture, greater business continuity, and higher levels of analyst job satisfaction with lower turnover. Risk-Based Alerting is a paradigm shift to smart and sustainable cybersecurity operations that offer adaptive basics required to effectively safeguard against dynamic cyber threats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it