Análisis bibliométrico: Caso de estudio, Palo Colorado. Un Enigma de la Situación Socioambiental Hídrica en el Estado de Guanajuato
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La calidad del agua en comunidades marginadas del estado de Guanajuato, México, representa un desafío crítico de salud pública, especialmente en aquellas que no cumplen con los estándares establecidos por la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-127-SSA1-2021. Este estudio se centra en la comunidad de Palo Colorado, ubicada en el municipio de San Felipe, mediante una revisión exhaustiva de fuentes bibliográficas y reportajes periodísticos, los hallazgos revelan una preocupante correlación entre la contaminación del agua y del suelo con la prevalencia de trastornos mentales entre los habitantes. Sin embargo, una hipótesis alternativa, plantea la posible incidencia de relaciones incestuosas dentro de la comunidad como otro factor contribuyente a esta compleja problemática. Este trabajo subraya la necesidad de investigaciones interdisciplinarias que exploren las interacciones entre factores ambientales y socioculturales, con el fin de comprender integralmente los determinantes de la salud en comunidades vulnerables y buscar soluciones efectivas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.044 | 0.102 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".