MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Structure-Based Method for Data Migration Between Heterogeneous DBMSs in Defense Systems

2025· article· W4416799466 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData migrationMaintainabilityConsistency (knowledge bases)Table (database)OracleProcess (computing)Key (lock)Data integrityData structureData access

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a mapping method based on structure to address consistency issues that may arise during data migration between heterogeneous databases operating in the defense sector. The table structure in the Oracle DB is referred to as Structure A, and the destination table in Microsoft SQL Server as Structure B. Data migration is performed through explicit field-to-field mapping. The proposed method ensures high-reliability migration by incorporating data type consistency checks between structures, field name mismatch detection, duplicate key insertion detection, string length overflow handling, and Open DataBase Connectivity-based query execution with error logging. The proposed method contributes to enhancing the stability and maintainability of the migration process through structural abstraction, and can be effectively applied in defense data environments where high data integrity and security are critical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207