MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DeepNRSfPP: Learning-Based Real-Time Non-Rigid Structure-from-Perspective Projection

2025· article· W4416799990 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Sepehrinour, Alireza Siadatan, Seham Al Abdul Wahid, Farah Mohammadi, Arghavan Asad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityToronto Metropolitan UniversityAlgoma University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)MonocularSmoothnessProjection (relational algebra)Perspective (graphical)Motion (physics)Deep learningArtificial neural network3D reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper, propose DeepNRSfPP, a novel hybrid learning-based framework for real-time non-rigid 3D reconstruction from monocular videos under perspective projection. Traditional non-rigid structure-from-motion (NRSfM) techniques often rely on orthographic assumptions and are computationally intensive, making them unsuitable for real-world, real-time applications. Our approach builds on the strengths of NRSfPP by integrating deep neural networks with geometric constraints, enabling fast and accurate reconstruction of dynamic, deformable surfaces from single-view video. Specifically, DeepNRSfPP leverages a deep temporal encoder to regress coarse 3D shapes and a perspective-aware optimization layer to refine reconstructions using motion smoothness and projection consistency. We evaluate our model on several benchmark datasets and demonstrate significant improvements over both classical and recent learning-based baselines in terms of accuracy and speed. Our system achieves real-time performance (>30 FPS) while maintaining fine-grained reconstruction quality, making it suitable for applications in augmented reality, human motion capture, and robotic perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207