MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416808398 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102226

Transportation injury inequities among Canadian children in a linked, population-based cohort

2025· article· en· W4416808398 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ryann E. Yeo, Linda Rothman, Marianne Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoisson regressionCohortInjury preventionOccupational safety and healthPoison controlSuicide preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsPedestrian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transportation injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for children. Risk is inequitable, but transportation injury studies often rely on ecological-level indicators of sociodemographics. This study examines individual and household-level social inequities in Canadian children which increase their risk of bicycling, pedestrian and motor vehicle occupant/driver injuries based on a unique linked data set. We analyzed three cohorts linking Canadian census data to health records: an emergency department (ED) cohort (n = ∼1,731,200), a hospitalization cohort (n = ∼3,615,500) and a mortality cohort (N = ∼4,664,000). We used Poisson regression to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of pedestrian, bicycling and motor vehicle occupant/driver injuries separately in each cohort. We found positive associations across most outcomes for male children and rural residence. For pedestrian and motor vehicle injuries, older age of the child at onset increased risk, while higher parental education level was protective. A single adult household was a predictor for traffic injury ED visits and hospitalizations for all modes of transportation studied. Commute mode of the child or adults in their household was associated with increased risk of both motor vehicle and bicycling injuries, suggesting it may have indicator value for household mode usage. Children experience varying risks of traffic injury based on household and individual characteristics, underscoring the need for systemic and targeted prevention efforts to reduce injuries and address health disparities. Future work could examine how preventive initiatives interact with social and area-level risk factors for children's traffic injury. • Individual sociodemographic factors influence risk of child transportation injuries. • Low income, low parental education, and rurality increased risk. • Indigenous status was one of the main risk factors for any type of child transportation-related hospitalizations. • Visible minority status, female sex, and urban residence decreased risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicInjury Epidemiology and PreventionFrench-language works237,207