MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

M3FNet: Multi-modal multi-temporal multi-scale data fusion network for tree species composition mapping

2025· article· en· W4416809267 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yuwei Cao, Nicholas C. Coops, Brent A. Murray, Ian Sinclair, Robere-McGugan Geordie

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and ForestryOntario Forest Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Resources CanadaEndocrine Society of AustraliaOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsPoint cloudTree (set theory)LidarScalabilitySensor fusionFusionDeep learningFeature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate estimation and mapping of t ree s pecies c omposition (TSC) is crucial for sustainable forest management. Recent advances in Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) technology and the availability of moderate spatial resolution, surface reflectance time series passive optical imagery offer scalable and efficient approaches for automated TSC estimation. In this research we develop a novel deep learning framework, M3F-Net (Multi-modal, Multi-temporal, and Multi-scale Fusion Network), that integrates multi-temporal Sentinel-2 (S2) imagery and single photon lidar (SPL) data to estimate TSC for nine common species across the 630,000-hectare Romeo Malette Forest in Ontario, Canada. A dual-level alignment strategy combines (i) superpixel-based spatial aggregation to reconcile mismatched resolutions between high-resolution SPL point clouds (>25 pts/m 2 ) and coarser S2 imagery (20 m), and (ii) a grid-based feature alignment that transforms unordered 3D point cloud features into structured 2D representations, enabling seamless integration of spectral and structural information. Within this aligned space, a multi-level Mamba-Fusion module jointly models multi-scale spatial patterns and seasonal dynamics through selective state-space modelling, efficiently capturing long-range dependencies while filtering redundant information. The framework achieves an R 2 score of 0.676, outperforming existing point cloud-based methods by 6% in TSC estimation. For leading species classification, our results are 6% better in terms of weighted F1, using either the TSC-based method or the standalone leading species classification method. Addition of seasonal S2 imagery added a 10% R 2 gain compared to the SPL-only mode. These results underscore the potential of fusing multi-modal and multi-temporal data with deep learning for scalable, high-accurate TSC estimation, offering a robust tool for large-scale management applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207