MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416809762 · doi:10.1038/s43246-025-01021-9

Direct to indirect band gap transition induced by approximately dark states

2025· article· en· W4416809762 on OpenAlexaff
Jiabao Yang, Mihir Date, Iván Ramírez, Vicky Hasse, Deepnarayan Biswas, S. Parkin, Maia G. Vergniory, Fernando de Juan, Claudia Felser, Matthew D. Watson, Niels B. M. Schröter

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de PointeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrillouin zoneBand gapSpectroscopySemiconductorDirect and indirect band gapsCrystal (programming language)Absorption (acoustics)Spectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent work suggests that crystal structures with two sublattice pairs per primitive cell can host “dark states”, electronic states that barely interact with light due to destructive interference, which makes them invisible in photoemission. In practice, however, dark states are only approximately dark, arising from near but imperfect translation symmetries. Here, we demonstrate a practical consequence of this in the semiconductor (NbSe 4 ) 3 I: Although its band structure indicates an almost direct gap, the material behaves optically like an indirect-gap semiconductor. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy uncovers weak spectral-weight bands folded from a larger Brillouin zone, reflecting approximate intra-unit-cell symmetry. These states form a small direct band gap consistent with transport data but exhibit very low optical transition probability. Instead, optical absorption is dominated by higher-energy transitions involving bands with stronger spectral weight, effectively enlarging the observed optical gap. Our results show that dark states are approximate phenomena with significant consequences for optoelectronic properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications MaterialsSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207