MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416815318 · doi:10.2147/nss.s557087

Association of Novel Sleep EEG Biomarkers with All-Cause Mortality in a Large Community-Based Cohort

2025· article· en· W4416815318 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jinhuan Huang, Longlong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueNature and Science of Sleep · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of WashingtonYork UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsCohortAssociation (psychology)CutoffCohort studyElectroencephalographySleep (system call)EpidemiologyComplement (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The prognostic value of sleep depth remains poorly understood. The odds ratio product (ORP) is a novel electroencephalogram-based biomarker of sleep depth. We investigated the association between ORP-derived biomarkers and all-cause mortality in a large community-based cohort. Methods: We analyzed 5802 Sleep Heart Health Study participants. A suite of ORP biomarkers was derived from baseline polysomnography, including mean ORP values across sleep stages, change in ORP across the night (ΔORP), interhemispheric sleep depth coherence (ORP Icc R/L ), and ORP architecture phenotypes. Cox proportional hazards models with false discovery rate (FDR) correction estimated mortality associations. Prognostic nomograms were constructed based on variables selected through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariable Cox regression. Results: During 11.0 years of follow-up, 1305 deaths occurred. After multivariable adjustment and FDR correction, higher ORP W (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39– 0.73), ORP REM (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69– 0.95), ORP N1 (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59– 0.87), ORP ICC R/L (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29– 0.81), and ΔORP (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56– 0.87) were associated with lower mortality risk, while higher ORP N3 (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.06– 1.81) predicted increased risk. ORP architecture phenotypes 1,2 (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06– 1.56), 1,3 (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05– 1.54), and 3,1 (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.19– 1.84) conferred higher mortality risk compared to phenotype 2,2. Non-linear associations and threshold effects were identified for ORP N1 , ORP ICC R/L , and ΔORP. Among ORP parameters examined, ΔORP and ORP architecture phenotypes were identified as the most important predictors through LASSO and multivariable Cox regression. Prognostic nomograms integrating these selected ORP metrics with traditional risk factors demonstrated excellent discrimination (C-index: 0.81). Conclusion: ORP-derived biomarkers are independently associated with all-cause mortality and complement conventional sleep metrics in refining mortality risk stratification. Identified threshold effects for several ORP parameters may provide potential cutoff points for clinical intervention. Keywords: EEG biomarkers, sleep depth, odds ratio product, all-cause mortality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature and Science of SleepSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207