MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416821157 · doi:10.1186/s12954-025-01272-2

Characterizing ‘Atmosphere’: exploring determinants of regular service attendance amongst integrated supervised consumption site clients in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside

2025· article· en· W4416821157 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin D. Scher, Kelli L. Cain, David K. Humphreys, Gillian W. Shorter

Bibliographic record

VenueHarm Reduction Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Service (business)DowntownAttendanceConsumption (sociology)Harm reductionService providerHealth psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Research has explored barriers and facilitators to supervised consumption sites (SCS) in Canadian settings. Despite this, little is known about what factors drive individuals to initiate and repeatedly attend specific SCS where multiple SCS options are available, such as in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES). The aim of this study was to understand the structural, contextual, and operational determinants of regular SCS attendance during Canada's ongoing overdose crisis. METHODS: Rapid-ethnographic fieldwork was conducted over a six-week period at an integrated SCS in Vancouver's DTES. This comprised an initial five-week period of non-participant observation (≈200 h) followed by a community consultation regarding the research design and question protocols. Qualitative data were then collected through five focus groups (n = 25) and 20 semi-structured interviews with regular service attendees with data analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Our findings highlight four important factors related to regular service attendance. The service had a regular clientele who described their attendance as routinized, which they attributed to four distinct factors: (1) the accessible location, (2) the on-site auxiliary health and support services, (3) the diversity of harm reduction provision, and (4) the atmosphere. Exploring the concept of atmosphere in more depth showed that it was characterized by the safety, familiarity, and inclusivity experienced within the service. Together, these factors facilitated a strong sense of belonging among attendees regarding the service and its community of staff and clients. CONCLUSION: Within the context of an ongoing overdose crisis, our findings highlight SCS service characteristics which facilitate routinized engagement including accessibility, wrap-around support, comprehensive and tailored harm reduction, and an inclusive welcoming atmosphere. These insights can inform policy makers and service providers in scaling and developing effective, client-centred SCSs to reduce harm and promote wellbeing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarm Reduction JournalSame topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskFrench-language works237,207