MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416823188 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.26.690749

Small molecule activator of phosphatase PP2A remodels scaffold PR65 structural dynamics to promote holoenzyme assembly

2025· preprint· en· W4416823188 on OpenAlexaff
Sema Zeynep Yilmaz, Anupam Banerjee, Satyaki Saha, Michael Ohlmeyer, Reuven Gordon, Laura S. Itzhaki, İvet Bahar, Mert Gür

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBinding siteDocking (animal)Protein phosphatase 2In silicoPlasma protein bindingHomology modelingProtein subunitFootprinting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Small molecule activators of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), hereafter SMAPs, have attracted substantial interest, for their potential to inhibit cancer cell proliferation by targeting PR65, the scaffold subunit of the PP2A heterotrimer. PR65 is a uniquely flexible and stable molecule composed of 15 tandem HEAT (Huntingtin, Elongation factor 3–PP2A–TOR1) repeats. We characterized the binding sites and interactions of two SMAPs ATUX-8385 and DT-061 with PR65 and evaluated effects on PR65 structural dynamics using docking and molecular dynamics simulations. We initiated SMAP-bound PR65 simulations starting from two binding sites: S1, determined by cryo-electron microscopy for DT-061 bound to PP2A, on the inner helices of the HEAT repeats 2 and 3 (2 i and 3 i ); and S2, predicted by docking of ATUX-8385 onto PR65, on 4 i and 5 i and outer helices 5 o and 6 o consistent with footprinting experiments. S2 proved to be a stable site for both SMAPs when initiating the simulations at S2. However, neither DT-061 nor ATUX-8385 demonstrated stable binding to S1. DT-061 rapidly dissociated from S1 to settle instead at a neighboring site S4 overlapping with our previously identified S3 for PR65 in extended form, suggesting that binding to S1 may be a 2-step process: an initial binding to PR65 alone, either to S3/S4 or S2, followed by movement to S3/S4, and then an induced relocation to S1 upon complexation with the regulatory and catalytic subunits. Targeted in silico mutagenesis showed that mutations at S2 and S4 destabilized SMAP binding to the PR65 (subunit). Heterotrimeric PP2A simulations showed that S3 and S4 binding were not persistent upon complexation. Together, these results corroborate our findings. Furthermore, preferentially stabilized a relatively extended PR65 conformation that would accommodate, if not promote, the assembly of the catalytic and regulatory subunits to prompt the activation of the trimeric phosphatase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesFrench-language works237,207